Crowdsource authoring as a tool for enhancing the quality of competency assessments in healthcare professions

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Items with full text/Total items : 45422/58598 (78%)
Visitors : 2546852 Online Users : 184

RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

TMUIR > Works submitted for Review > Scholarly output for promotion > 112 > Item 987654321/65142

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://libir.tmu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/65142

Title:	Crowdsource authoring as a tool for enhancing the quality of competency assessments in healthcare professions
Authors:	林哲瑋 Lin CW, Clinciu DL, Salcedo D, Huang CW, Kang EYN, Li YJ
Contributors:	醫學系醫學教育暨人文學科
Date:	2023-11
Issue Date:	2025-03-26 15:32:34 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	The current Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is complex, costly, and difficult to provide high-quality assessments. This pilot study employed a focus group and debugging stage to test the Crowdsource Authoring Assessment Tool (CAAT) for the creation and sharing of assessment tools used in editing and customizing, to match specific users’ needs, and to provide higher-quality checklists. Competency assessment international experts (n = 50) were asked to 1) participate in and experience the CAAT system when editing their own checklist, 2) edit a urinary catheterization checklist using CAAT, and 3) complete a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire consisting of 14 items to evaluate its four domains. The study occurred between October 2018 and May 2019. The median time for developing a new checklist using the CAAT was 65.76 minutes whereas the traditional method required 167.90 minutes. The CAAT system enabled quicker checklist creation and editing regardless of the experience and native language of participants. Participants also expressed the CAAT enhanced checklist development with 96% of them willing to recommend this tool to others. The use of a crowdsource authoring tool as revealed by this study has efficiently reduced the time to almost a third it would take when using the traditional method. In addition, it allows collaborations to partake on a simple platform which also promotes contributions in checklist creation, editing, and rating.
Relation:	PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0278571
Description:	【112-1 升等】臺北醫學大學教師升等專門著作職別：專任送審等級：副教授教學實踐研究-著作送審
Data Type:	article
Appears in Collections:	[Scholarly output for promotion] 112 [Department of Medical Humanities] Periodical Articles

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	10	View/Open

著作權聲明 Copyright Notice

本平台之數位內容為臺北醫學大學所收錄之機構典藏，包含體系內各式學術著作及學術產出。秉持開放取用的精神，提供使用者進行資料檢索、下載與取用，惟仍請適度、合理地於合法範圍內使用本平台之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content on this platform is part of the Taipei Medical University Institutional Repository, featuring various academic works and outputs from the institution. It offers free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please use the content appropriately and within legal boundaries to respect copyright owners' rights. For commercial use, please obtain prior authorization from the copyright owner.
瀏覽或使用本平台，視同使用者已完全接受並瞭解聲明中所有規範、中華民國相關法規、一切國際網路規定及使用慣例，並不得為任何不法目的使用TMUIR。
By utilising the platform, users are deemed to have fully accepted and understood all the regulations set out in the statement, relevant laws of the Republic of China, all international internet regulations, and usage conventions. Furthermore, users must not use TMUIR for any illegal purposes.
本平台盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益。若發現本平台之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，煩請權利人通知本平台維護人員([email protected])，將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
TMUIR is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff([email protected]). We will remove the work from the repository.

Loading...