Taipei Medical University Institutional Repository:Item 987654321/6087
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 45069/58245 (77%)
Visitors : 2370931      Online Users : 157
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://libir.tmu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/6087


    Title: 台北市醫療院所負責醫師對醫療爭議調處之認知、態度探討及調處之法律經濟分析
    Physicians’ Knowledge and Attitude and the Legal Economics of Medical Dispute Administration Mediation in Taipei
    Authors: 洪敬宜
    Ching-I Hung
    Contributors: 醫務管理學研究所
    Keywords: 負責醫師
    醫療爭議
    調處
    認知
    態度
    法律經濟分析
    in charge physician
    medical dispute
    administration mediation
    knowledge
    attitude
    legal economical analysis
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 15:52:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文之研究目的有四:(一)以問卷調查全台北市醫療院所之西醫負責醫師對醫療爭議調處之認知及態度;(二)瞭解全台北市醫療院所之西醫負責醫師醫療爭議經驗;(三)蒐集全台北市醫療爭議調處之各類次級資料與案件類型描述;(四)以法律經濟分析探討調處與其他醫療爭議解決方式之成效。本研究之資料來源分別透過1.結構式問卷(總計發出1,281份問卷,共回收350份,回收率為27.32%,有效回收率25.21%);2.台北市政府衛生局醫療爭議調處次級資料庫;3.司法院判決書資料庫;4.名義技術團體法(Nominal Group Technique, NGT)四者進行。研究結果如下所述:

    執業至今有41.56%之負責醫師發生過醫療爭議經驗; 90.96%之負責醫師皆對醫療爭議調處有相當程度之瞭解,僅有3.2%對調處抱持著負面態度;其中負責醫師之性別會影響負責醫師對醫療爭議調處之認知,負責醫師之年齡、對醫療爭議調處之認知及是否發生過醫療爭議經驗則會影響負責醫師對醫療爭議調處之態度。此外,本研究所得調處次級資料庫中90年至94年間之醫療爭議申訴案件中,最常發生醫療爭議之科別以內科為最高,其次分別為外科及婦產科;發生醫療爭議之最主要原因為與醫療有直接相關之原因最多達62.9%。但在醫療爭議申訴案件中已調處件數僅達18.7%,調處案件中之和解金額則介於0元至115萬元之間。法律濟分析方面,由其法律請求權預期價值計算結果得知,若以非衛生局調解及司法訴訟比較之,發生醫療爭議,以醫師之角度來看,建議採取之解決管道順序為非衛生局調解>司法訴訟;若以病人之角度來看,發生醫療爭議建議取之解決管道順序亦為非衛生局調解>司法訴訟;倘若以衛生局調處及司法訴訟比較之,發生醫療爭議,以醫師之角度來看,議採取之解決管道順序為衛生局調處>司法訴訟;若以病人之角度來看,發生醫療爭議建議取之解決管道順序亦為司法訴訟>衛生局調處。
    The purposes of this study were as the following: to investigate the knowledge of and the attitude toward medical dispute administration mediation of physicians in charge of hospitals and clinics and their experiences through a questionnaire survey; secondary data analyses of the medical dispute mediation records of Taipei city government; the legal economical analyses of judicial proceedings and alternative dispute resolutions. The materials of this research came from four sources: the questionnaire survey, the medical dispute mediation files of the health bureau of Taipei City Government, the judicial decision database of Judicial Yuan of the Republic of China, and the expert opinions extracted by the nominal group technique.
    The result indicated that 41.56% of the in charge physicians have ever encountered medical disputes in the past; 90.96% of the responding physicians have a good understanding of medical dispute administration mediation and only 3.2% of them have negative attitudes toward administration mediation. The physicians’ gender will influence knowledge. The physicians’ age, knowledge of administration mediation, medical dispute experiences will influence their attitude toward administration mediation. 889 disputed cases have been reported to the health bureau from 2001 to 2005. Internists, obstetricians/gynecologists, general surgeons and orthopedic surgeons account for most of these disputes, and the most important reason causing disputes is clinical practice related, 62.9%. However, of the 889, only 18.7% filed for mediation, and the monetary amounts of settlements range from 0 to 1,150,000 new Taiwan dollars.
    As to the legal economical analyses, when we compared non-administration mediation with lawsuit, both physicians and patients would prefer mediation from the perspective of expectation value. On the other hand, when the comparison is between administration mediation and lawsuit, physicians would prefer administration mediation, whereas patients would prefer lawsuit.
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[School of Health Care Administration] Dissertations/Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    摘要.doc28KbMicrosoft Word132View/Open
    摘要.pdf64KbAdobe PDF144View/Open
    摘要.ppt116KbMicrosoft Powerpoint207View/Open
    摘要.ps393KbPostscript73View/Open


    All items in TMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    著作權聲明 Copyright Notice
    • 本平台之數位內容為臺北醫學大學所收錄之機構典藏,包含體系內各式學術著作及學術產出。秉持開放取用的精神,提供使用者進行資料檢索、下載與取用,惟仍請適度、合理地於合法範圍內使用本平台之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,請先取得著作權人之授權。

      The digital content on this platform is part of the Taipei Medical University Institutional Repository, featuring various academic works and outputs from the institution. It offers free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please use the content appropriately and within legal boundaries to respect copyright owners' rights. For commercial use, please obtain prior authorization from the copyright owner.

    • 瀏覽或使用本平台,視同使用者已完全接受並瞭解聲明中所有規範、中華民國相關法規、一切國際網路規定及使用慣例,並不得為任何不法目的使用TMUIR。

      By utilising the platform, users are deemed to have fully accepted and understood all the regulations set out in the statement, relevant laws of the Republic of China, all international internet regulations, and usage conventions. Furthermore, users must not use TMUIR for any illegal purposes.

    • 本平台盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益。若發現本平台之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,煩請權利人通知本平台維護人員([email protected]),將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。

      TMUIR is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff([email protected]). We will remove the work from the repository.

    Back to Top
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback