資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
http://libir.tmu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/34199
|
| 題名: | 醫療數位學習平台使用意圖之研究-以北部某醫學中心為例 |
| 作者: | 宋豫萍 |
| 貢獻者: | 醫學資訊研究所 |
| 日期: | 2010 |
| 上傳時間: | 2010-09-09 11:27:39 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 隨著資訊科技及網路技術的快速發展，數位學習的最大特色就是學習者可以不受時空限制並依自己的喜好可自主地學習，資訊科技已對學習者或授教者在教與學上產生極大的影響，目前許多醫學中心已將數位學習列為輔助教學的重要議題，而數位學習是以學習者為中心導向的學習方式，數位學習的課程內容需具備豐富且多媒體資源，讓學習者以同步或非同步的方式，學習到更多及更好的課程，對於知識的取得與分享模式較以往的學習方式更為便利。因此，網路的教學環境中，學習平台的好壞會對整個教學環境的速度與穩定性產生極大的影響，唯有良好之學習平台，才能提供使用者合適的學習課程。
因此，本研究以科技接受模式3 及Kolb 的學習風格量表3.1 版為基礎架構，來探討影響醫療數位學習平台系統使用者實際使用意圖之因素。研究結果顯示，醫院的員工在使用醫療數位學習平台時，會受到周遭同事及主管的影響，當同事或主管對此平台持有正向之評價，使用此平台的意向及知覺有用性也會大幅提昇，且會提昇使用者的地位形象；當使用者認為此平台的使用能為其得到較好的聲望後，表示此平台與醫療作業具有關聯性，使用者能展現更好的工作表現與結果，對於平台之優缺點瞭解後，能明確的告知醫院內其他之使用者，將提昇此平台的知覺有用性；醫院的使用者具備電腦自我效能、電腦焦慮及電腦有趣性，對於平台的易用性也會產生影響；當平台的有用性及易用性越高，醫院員工對其接受度將會提高，大大提昇使用醫療數位學習平台之意圖。
With rapid development of information technology and Internet technologies, digitallearning enables learners to study whenever and wherever they like. Information
technology has posed significant influence on learners or instructors. Currently, a number of medical centers have taken digital learning as a major issue in education assistance. Digital learning is a way of learning focusing on learners; digital learning courses have rich and multimedia resources, letting learners study more and better courses synchronously or asynchronously. This makes acquirement and sharing of knowledge more convenient than before. Thus, in Internet teaching environment, learning platform greatly affects speed and stability of the entire
teaching environment; only good learning environment provides learners withappropriate learning courses.
Based on technology acceptance model 3 and Kolb learning style scale V 3.1, thisstudy explores factors of affecting medical digital learning platform users'intentions.The findings show that, when using medical digital learning platform,employees at hospitals are affected by colleagues and supervisors. If employees or supervisors have positive evaluation on the platform, willingness and perception of
using such a platform is greatly enhanced. Status and image of users is also enhanced. Once users believe using such a platform will help them have better prestige, this platform is in association with medical operation. Users can have
better work performance and results. Understanding the strength and weakness of the platform, they can specifically inform other users at the hospital, which will
increase the platform’s perceived usefulness. Self-efficacy of computer, computer anxiety and computer interest of users will also affect easy-to-use of the platform.Higher usefulness and easy-to-use of a platform will make hospital employees more willing to accept and use medical digital learning platform. |
| 關聯: | 139頁 |
| 描述: | 誌謝
目錄 i
表目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
中文摘要 vii
Abstract ix
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究範圍 3
1.4 研究流程 4
1.5 論文架構 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
2.1 e化資訊系統態度影響與期望之探討 7
2.2 數位學習概況 12
2.3 數位教學平台之定義與概況 16
2.4 醫療數位學習平台概況 18
2.5 科技接受模式 22
2.6 數位學習的學習風格種類 38
第三章 研究方法 46
3.1 研究架構 47
3.2 研究假說 48
3.3 操作型定義 54
3.4 研究設計 62
3.5 資料收集方法 67
3.6 資料分析法 68
第四章 資料分析 70
4.1 敍述性統計分析 70
4.2 因素分析 90
4.3 樣本信度分析 100
4.4 單因子變異數分析 104
4.5 結構方程式 114
第五章 結論與建議 120
5.1 各構面結果分析 120
5.2 學習者的學習風格與人口特性分析 126
5.3 未來研究方向與建議 128
參考文獻 130
Appendix D. KLSI Version 3.1 Approval Letter 135
附件一、醫療數位學習平台問卷 136
中文文獻
張滿香, 黃世貝. e 化-健康管理中心資訊系統特色. 2003.
陳玉枝. 電腦資訊與護理管理. 護理新象 1992;2:82-99.
曾院美. 急診護理人員對於PDA 之接受性研究：以急診檢傷護理評估系統為例:
國立台北護理學院; 2003.
沈鈺翔. 多模式使用者介面無線護理資訊系統可用性評估:以急診檢傷: 國立陽
明大學; 2004.
顏玉雯. 護理資訊系統人機介面可用性及使用滿意度調查: 國立台北護理學院
2006.
黃劭彥、陳雪如、李超雄、施志成. 導入企業資源規劃系統對財務、管理及稽核
面之影響. 會計研究月刊 2006;第247 期:52-8.
顧添利. 從台灣與日本錯帳事件來探討資訊系統內部控制. 2006.
吳琮璠. 流程改造、作業風險與內部控制. 會計研究月刊 2007;258:12-3.
吳莉欽. 電腦網路學習環境的理念與問題. 教育資料與圖書館學 2002;39:441-55.
許正妹, 張奕華 I. 教學平台發展與設計之研究: 以 Blackboard 和中山網路大學為例. In: 教育研究與發展期刊; 2005.
陳恆順, 陸哲駒, 賴金鑫. 數位學習系統在醫學教育之應用. 臺灣醫學 2004;8:817-25.
蔡淑薇. 高中職學生學習風格、自我調整學習與學業成就之關係
2004
王琇姿. 學習風格融入綜合活動學習領域之指定內涵---自我探索與瞭解之行動研究; 2006.
蔡淑薇. 高中職學生學習風格、自我調整學習與學業成就之關係; 2004.
黃學堂. 不同學習風格對高職生數位學習成效影響之研究; 2006.
蘇俊吉. 網路輔助教學、學習風格對學習成就影響之研究—以國中社會領域為例—; 2006.
曾家鴻. 自我調整學習策略及二階段診斷性測驗應用於國中「自然與生活科技課」對不同學習風格學生學習成效之影響; 2005.
侯貴文. 線上遊戲教學對不同學習風格之國一學生學業成就影響之研究; 2007.
林秋萍. 國中學生多元智能與學習風格關係之研究－以台灣中部五縣市為例 2007.
陳盈慈. 工業設計系學生學習風格之研究; 2005.
江盈慧. 從學習風格探析高齡者資訊通訊科技的使用; 2010.
蘇輝明, 原住民學童之學習風格與教育上的應用, Retrived December 24, 2006,
from. (Accessed at http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/40/40-11htm, 2004.)
施賀建, 戚玉樑, 黃崇德. 國立成功大學 [二○○ 三數位生活與網際網路科技研
討會]. 2003.
田芳華. 資訊素養與學習風格關係之實徵研究── 以大三學生為例. 2009.
蘇伯方. 網誌採用模式之研究 網誌採用模式之研究 網誌採用模式之研究. In:
中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文; 2004.
王保進. 視窗版 SPSS 與行為科學研究. 台北市: 心理出版社有限公司 2002.
黃俊英. 多變量分析，翰蘆圖書出版有限公司. 台北; 2000.
吳明隆、涂金堂. SPSS與統計應用，五南圖書. 台北; 2006.
英文文獻
DILLON T, BLANKENSHIP R, CREWS Jr T. Nursing attitudes and images of
electronic patient record systems. Computers Informatics Nursing 2005;23:139.
Moody L, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in
nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. Computers Informatics
Nursing 2004;22:337.
Dillon T, McDowell D, Salimian F, Conklin D. Perceived ease of use and usefulness
of bedside-computer systems. Computers in nursing 1998;16:151.
Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology. MIS quarterly 1989;13:319-40.
Simpson G, Kenrick M. Nurses' attitudes toward computerization in clinical practice
in a British general hospital. Computers in nursing 1997;15:37.
Marasovic C, Kenney C, Elliott D, Sindhusake D. Attitudes of Australian nurses
toward the implementation of a clinical information system. Computers in
nursing 1997;15:91.
Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected
by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a
two-year study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
2003;10:69.
McLANE S. Designing an EMR planning process based on staff attitudes toward and
opinions about computers in healthcare. Computers Informatics Nursing
2005;23:85.
Lee TT. Nurses' concerns about using information systems: analysis of comments on a
computerized nursing care plan system in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Nursing
2005;14:344-53.
Clark R, Mayer R. e-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for
consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer. 2003.
Gagne R, Driscoll M. Essentials of learning for instruction(2th ed). NJ: PrenticeHall:
Dryden Press Hinsdale, II; 1988.
Piskurich G, Piskurich J. Utilizing classroom approach to prepare learners for
e-learning. Preparing learners for e-learning San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer 2003.
Muthukumar S. Analysis and Design of an E-learning Model for Organizational
Excellence and Versatility. Interpersonal computing and technology journal
2004;11:1-18.
About Blackboard. Retrieved Oct. 11. 2004. (Accessed at
http://www.blackboard.com.)
Learning without limits: Flexible e-learning solutions for institutions across the
educational spectrum. Retrieved 2004/10/11., 2004. (Accessed at
http://www.webct.com.)
Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology. A critical
review of the technology acceptance model Information & Management
2003;40:191-204.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory
and research. 1975.
Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior:
Prentice-Hall; 1980.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision
processes 1991;50:179-211.
Schiffman L, Kanuk L. Consumer Behavior, 7th. In: Prentice Hall, Inc; 2000.
Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. IN: J 1985.
Davis F, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: a
comparison of two theoretical models. Management science 1989;35:982-1003.
Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology. MIS quarterly 1989:319-40.
Schein E. Organizational Psychology Englewood Cliffs. New Jersy: Prentice-Hall
1980:19-26.
Vboom V. Work and motivation. In: New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1964.
Pfeffer J. Organizations and organization theory. Cambridge, MA 1982.
Davis F. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user
information systems: theory and results: Doctoral Dissertation, MIT Sloan School of
Management; 1986.
Venkatesh V, Davis F. A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use:
Development and Test*. Decision Sciences 1996;27:451-81.
Venkatesh V, Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model:
four longitudinal field studies. Management science 2000:186-204.
Warshaw P. A new model for predicting behavioral intentions: An alternative to
Fishbein. Journal of Marketing Research 1980;17:153-72.
French J, Raven B, Cartwright D. Studies in social power. Institute for Social
Research, Ann Arbor 1959.
Moore G, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of
adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research
1991;2:192-222.
Leonard-Barton D, Deschamps I. Managerial influence in the implementation of new
technology. Management science 1988;34:1252-65.
Hartwick J, Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system
use. Management science 1994;40:440-65.
Goodhue D, Thompson R. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS
Quarterly 1995;19:213-36.
Vessey I. Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature.
Decision Sciences 1991;22:219-40.
Venkatesh V, Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model:
Four longitudinal field studies. Management science 2000;46:186-204.
Beach L, Mitchell T. Image theory, the unifying perspective. Decision making in the
workplace: A unified perspective 1996:1-20.
Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on
interventions. Decision Sciences 2008;39:273-315.
Garger S, Guild P. Learning Styles: The Crucial Differences. Curriculum Review
1984;23:9-12.
McDermott P, Beitman B. Standardization of a scale for the study of children's
learning styles: Structure, stability, and criterion validity. Psychology in the
Schools 1984;21:5-14.
Kolb D. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development:
Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 1984.
Sadler-Smith E. 'Learning Style': frameworks and instruments. Educational
psychology(Dorchester-on-Thames Print) 1997;17:51-63.
Brown B. Learning styles and vocational education practice. Practice Application
Brief, ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career and Vocational Education,
Ohio,(ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 422 478) 1998.
Aragon S, Johnson S, Shaik N. The influence of learning style preferences on student
success in online versus face-to-face environments. The American Journal of
Distance Education 2002;16:227-43.
Akdemir O, & Koszalka, T. A. Investigating the Relationships Among Instructional
Strategies and Learning Styles in Online Environments. Paper presented at the
Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 27th, Chicago,
IL 2004.
Kolb D. Learning style inventory: Self-scoring inventory and interpretation booklet.
Boston: Mcber and Company 1985.
Kolb A. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—Version 3.1 2005 Technical
Specifications. Boston, MA: Hay Resource Direct 2005.
Taylor S, Todd P. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing
models. Information systems research 1995;6:144-76.
Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on
interventions. Decision Sciences 2008;39:273.
Klymkowsky M, Maynell L, Polson A. Polar asymmetry in the organization of the
cortical cytokeratin system of Xenopus laevis oocytes and embryos
. Development 1987;100:543.
Mager R. No Self-Efficacy, No Performance. Training 1992;29:32-6.
Compeau D, Higgins C. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and
initial test. MIS Quarterly 1995:189-211.
Igbaria M, Guimaraes T, Davis G. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage
via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems
1995;11:114.
Bertrand M, Bouchard S. APPLYING THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE
MODEL TO VR WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE FAVORABLE TO ITS USE.
Journal of CyberTherapy&Rehabilitation 2008;1.
Agarwal R, Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived
voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences
1997;28:557-82.
Igbaria M, Zinatelli N, Cragg P, Cavaye A. Personal computing acceptance factors in
small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Quarterly 1997:279-305.
Wu J, Wang S. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised
technology acceptance model. Information & Management 2005;42:719-29.
Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.
Management science 1996:85-92.
Bagozzi R, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the
academy of marketing science 1988;16:74-94. |
| 顯示於類別: | [醫學資訊研究所] 博碩士論文
|
在TMUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
